In response
to my classmates’ blog about how society views today’s political debates, I have
to totally agree with your critique about presidential elections in today’s
society. It is defiantly true that I can’t
stand to have to talk to my friends about their views on politics. Even worse, I have to read their snotty
remarks about a certain candidate on Facebook all the time. During these presidential debates, I sat
there, trying to figure out which candidate is the one that would help me out
the most, the one that was interested in the same things that I was. But as I sat there listening to them, all I wondered
was how long they had to sit with their advisors to make sure that they get
this jab, how could the make sure that they hit their opponent with this
comment and how can we work in a blow to something their saying. They must sit in a room and decide what their
opponent is going to say and just find a way to not answer the question they
were asked and just entertain the public.
I agree with your first point that today’s society should be one that is
desperate to talk politics, but when all we can talk about is how they
destroyed their opponent on television the night before, were not really
worried to much with what is going on in the country. I feel I could compare it to friends talking
about a boxing match, how they stopped that round just because the bell
rung. Now if it were a boxing match
discussion that was going on, defiantly count me in, I at least know that a
match is what we were waiting for.
Hispanic Voice on American Politics
Friday, November 16, 2012
Friday, November 2, 2012
Republicans on Women's Health Care
I’m sure that most people of my generation would agree
(the women anyway) that women’s health care policy should be decided by
women. What do men know about being
pregnant, taking birth control, or worrying about breast and cervical
cancer? Absolutely nothing. Yet Republicans in congress this year are
attacking women’s health care in general, not just abortions anymore.
It seems incredible and for the life of me I cannot think
what these men are thinking! If Republicans
were successful, they would cut funding from Planned Parenthood, a resource
that is a general go-to for most low income women. An organization where women
can get the emergency contraceptive pill, receive pregnancy test , STD tests
and a variety of other services that women need. It would be a sad thing to see it go under
just because these men don’t think it is necessary.
But if one stops to think about this attitude, would they
feel the same way if it were men the ones that needed these services? Could we imagine a world where it is men who
have to worry about being pregnant? They
undoubtedly would argue that these services were necessary and should be
available for the public, what more they should be easily obtainable. If a man had a day in women’s shoes, how
would this effect their view on government support for their health care?
I know that in my own personal opinion, if any old white
man tried to tell me what to do with my body and decisions about my life, I would
tell him exactly where he could stick his advise. There is no way that he could ever understand
what I feel and he should not pretend to know what is best for me and my
body.
Friday, October 19, 2012
Sure, why don't we help people that don't deserve it?
As an assistant professor of political science, Tehama
Lopez Bunyasi surprises me with her article in the New York Times, arguing that
we should release more people from prison so that there is less income inequality. The very idea that people should be released
from prison and offered more assistance to rebuild their life is absurd. Those people are in jail because of the fact
that they have proven that they cannot be productive members of society. Agreed, too much of taxpayers’ money is spent
on prisons but, I do not agree with her in her views. Why should people be released from prison?
They have to pay for their crimes just the way the American public has decided
they should. If she was trying to reach
out to the minorities in America, by pointing out that the Anti-Drug Abuse Act
of 1986 affected black and brown communities more than white communities she utterly
failed I believe. Anyone who does not
want to violate this law, stay away from drugs! Its as easy as that.
As a member of a minority group, I have no trouble
following the law and staying away from drugs.
If these people were found guilty of their crimes they should pay. Her idea is that by letting these people out
of prison will help them contribute to society well I believe that it is in the
nature of people to continue in things they are accustomed to. If they are let out of prison, there is no guarantee
that they will not fall right back into their old habits, which is something I believe
they will do given the chance.
Especially if they are not forced to serve the time that they were
sentenced for their crimes. How about we
focus on helping people, so that they don’t have to turn to a lifestyle that is
harmful to the community, and to ultimately to themselves.
Friday, October 5, 2012
Nicholas D. Kristof of the New York Times
states that the top 1 percent of America has more collective wealth than the
bottom 90 percent. As if we didn’t already
know that. I have to say that his
article was well written and persuasive, comparing America to a kindergarten
classroom. He implies that one could
look at a student in kindergarten who has all the toys, and who does not want
to share with the rest of the class, and one would come to the conclusion that
this is what America has basically boiled down too. One little kid who believes that all the toys
are his to play with, and that he has no need to share with the rest to the
class. He writes this for and as a part
of the middle class. Obviously when oneself
is not the one little kid who has all the toys to play with, we cry and wine
when we cannot play with all the toys, seeing him with so many. He supports his argument with figures that
the public could easily verify as true, such as information on the six heirs of
Sam Walton (the founder of Walmart). I think his article would defiantly support
most of middle class America’s views on the distribution of wealth in this
country.
He also doesn’t just complain and nag like
one would expect with someone who is unhappy with the system, he offers his
views on how the government could possible make things better for the
distribution of wealth. This is another plus point in his article. I know that I defiantly don’t want to sit and
read something that nags and wines all the time never coming up with a possible
solution. He believes that focusing on education
would help solve this. Doesn’t that just
make the most sense? When a person has the opportunity to be educated and
productive in the community at an early age, it is easier to be successful, and
do more to get ahead if that is what we want.
As a part of the bottom part of the
classroom, I agree with his analysis on distribution of wealth. That little kid has got to learn to share his
toys!
Thursday, September 20, 2012
In an
article published on CNN’s website, Tom Cohen summarizes Mitt Romeny’s appearances
on televised forums appealing to the Latino community. Both candidates know that the Latino
community is the fastest growing ethnic group in America and I believe that if
not in this election, then in future ones, they will be a big voter bloc both
parties will have to try and win over.
Obama has already given the Latino community reason to back him. This summer he implemented deferred action
for young illegal immigrants which allow them to apply for a valid work permit
for up to two years. This I believe gave
him a great standing with Hispanic voters and put Romney in a bit of a tricky
situation. When asked if he would deport
those young immigrants that would benefit from Obama’s plan he just said that
he would implement a “permanent solution to the problem”. That does not answer the question! Romney
needs to stop tip-toeing around the issue.
He needs to let the public know what his “permanent” solution would
be. He needs to let the public know
what he would with Obama’s already existing program. Since he already stated that he is against
the Dream Act, why would Hispanic Americans choose to back him in this election?
Anyone interested
in this upcoming election I think would be interested in this article. It hits many concerns Latinos have, and shows
how Romney is not really answering the questions he is presented with regarding
these concerns.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)